AdvLaunch
← All case studies

Evidence review · Skool · New Zealand

Premier Business Academy

Two screenshots. Two different facts. No invented join.

The retained records show Meta application volume and a separate Skool community snapshot. They do not establish which applicants became paid members or how much revenue the campaign produced.

0
website submit applications
0
applications from one ad
0
members in Skool snapshot
0
retained evidence snapshots

Answer first: the retained evidence supports 3,403 website submit applications across eight Meta ads and a separate snapshot of 149 total Skool members. It does not support 149 paid acquisitions, a 4.4% lead-to-paid conversion rate, or revenue derived by multiplying community size by list price.

What the records actually show

Both screenshots are useful. They answer different questions. The Meta view shows creative-level application results; the Skool view shows a point-in-time community listing. A defensible acquisition claim needs the missing contact-level link between them.

Retained Meta Ads Manager screenshot showing eight ads and website submit application results
Meta evidence. Eight visible result rows sum to 3,403 website submit applications; the largest row is 2,847. Spend, impressions, purchases, and customer identity are not visible.
Retained Skool snapshot showing a private community, 149 members, and a listed price of $499 per month
Skool evidence. The snapshot shows 149 members, a private community, a $499/month listed price, and 50 course items. It does not show payment status, join date, source, or revenue.

The evidence boundary

Supported

  • The Meta screenshot contains eight ads and 3,403 website submit applications in total.
  • One ad accounts for 2,847 of those applications—about 84% of the displayed total.
  • The separate Skool snapshot shows a private community with 149 total members.
  • The same Skool snapshot shows a listed price of $499/month and 50 course items.

Not established

  • That all 149 members were paid acquisitions.
  • That any specific Meta application became a Skool member.
  • A 4.4% lead-to-paid conversion rate or any derived revenue figure.
  • Ad spend, cost per lead, webinar attendance, retention, or return on ad spend.

What can be learned without overclaiming

The creative distribution is the strongest usable finding. One ad generated roughly 84% of the displayed application results. That supports a narrow lesson: creative performance was highly concentrated, so testing multiple executions mattered.

It does not prove why that ad won. The retained screenshot does not expose audience, spend, impressions, cost per application, delivery period, or downstream customer quality. Any explanation of the mechanism would be a hypothesis until those fields are recovered.

The missing proof is specific: export the 3,403 application records with campaign identifiers, join them to Skool or payment records at contact level, and then report paid conversions, refunds, retention, and revenue by source. Until that join exists, those outcome states stay separate.

Evidence method

A result is not an outcome until the records join.

We now track ad result, contact, booked call, qualified meeting, payment, retention, and revenue as separate states. That makes the public proof smaller—but much more useful to an operator deciding what the evidence really says.

Ready to scale

Ready to fill your community?

30-minute strategy call. We review your community, your current acquisition, and whether the Flywheel is the right fit. No deck, no fluff.